Attaining Level 3 of the new Code for Sustainable Homes will cost 3 per cent more than EcoHomes standard
The average additional cost of achieving Level 3 of the new Code for Sustainable Homes will be around 3 per cent more than the old standard of EcoHomes ‘Very Good’, according to research published today on behalf of English Partnerships and the Housing Corporation.
Researchers at Cyril Sweett, the cost consultants who produced the A Cost Review of the Code for Sustainable Homes report, found that costs will range for different house types and technologies from an additional 0.4per cent to an additional 6.2per cent. The benefits of achieving Level 3 of the new Code will see a 25per cent reduction in carbon dioxide emissions per home, and water-usage savings of 21 litres per person per day, over an average home built to EcoHomes ‘Very Good’. The additional cost therefore produces more efficient results and more sustainable homes.
Registration of developments under The Code for Sustainable Homes starts this month. The Government is likely to propose that from April next year all new housing will be rated under the Code as a stepping stone towards all new homes being zero carbon by 2016. English Partnerships and the Housing Corporation have already adopted Level 3 of the Code.
Steve Carr, Head of Policy and Economics at English Partnerships said: ‘This report shows that the housebuilding sector can tackle global warming without major extra cost. For some of our development partners there may be no real extra cost at all because they are already using the energy saving design and construction methods needed to get to Level 3 of the Code.
‘We have to start adapting to climate change now. Housebuilders who work with us on our land in the early stages are likely to have an advantage over their competitors in the future.’
Matt Leach, Director of Policy and Communications at the Housing Corporation said: ‘Attitudes to green issues have been transformed throughout the building industry as people's aspirations for higher environmental standards continue to grow. We're proud of the part we're playing in accelerating this change by ensuring that all Housing Corporation-funded homes will meet this standard.
‘Moving to Level 3 of the Code for Sustainable Homes - reducing carbon emissions by 25per cent and saving 21 litres of water per person per day - is a considerable achievement, and will support the entire housing sector as it embraces the need to move towards zero carbon building in the future.
‘This report from Cyril Sweett is the just the first in a range of support measures to help the sector embrace this challenge as cost-effectively as possible, raising standards and saving fuel bills for the people who live in our homes, as well as directly contributing to measures tackling climate change across the economy.’
The report, which looked at four approaches to achieving Level 3 applied across six different house types, found that the Code would be most expensive to achieve in traditionally built detached and terraced houses. Apartments and two house types using modern methods of construction were the cheapest.
Further analysis of results showed that costs are likely to be lowest where it is possible to use wind energy or site-wide combined heat and power (CHP) technologies. It concludes that a planning requirement to use renewable energy would have a major impact on the strategy for meeting the Code’s energy standards.
Adam MacTavish, a Director of Management Consultancy at Cyril Sweett commented: ‘Whilst the costs of achieving these standards using traditional methods are high there are good reasons to expect actual costs to reduce as both the industry and its supply chain begin to focus on environmental performance.
‘These standards amplify the benefit of taking innovative approaches to both design and delivery. The extent to which housebuilders embrace this will begin to have a material impact upon their success.’
Researchers at Cyril Sweett, the cost consultants who produced the A Cost Review of the Code for Sustainable Homes report, found that costs will range for different house types and technologies from an additional 0.4per cent to an additional 6.2per cent. The benefits of achieving Level 3 of the new Code will see a 25per cent reduction in carbon dioxide emissions per home, and water-usage savings of 21 litres per person per day, over an average home built to EcoHomes ‘Very Good’. The additional cost therefore produces more efficient results and more sustainable homes.
Registration of developments under The Code for Sustainable Homes starts this month. The Government is likely to propose that from April next year all new housing will be rated under the Code as a stepping stone towards all new homes being zero carbon by 2016. English Partnerships and the Housing Corporation have already adopted Level 3 of the Code.
Steve Carr, Head of Policy and Economics at English Partnerships said: ‘This report shows that the housebuilding sector can tackle global warming without major extra cost. For some of our development partners there may be no real extra cost at all because they are already using the energy saving design and construction methods needed to get to Level 3 of the Code.
‘We have to start adapting to climate change now. Housebuilders who work with us on our land in the early stages are likely to have an advantage over their competitors in the future.’
Matt Leach, Director of Policy and Communications at the Housing Corporation said: ‘Attitudes to green issues have been transformed throughout the building industry as people's aspirations for higher environmental standards continue to grow. We're proud of the part we're playing in accelerating this change by ensuring that all Housing Corporation-funded homes will meet this standard.
‘Moving to Level 3 of the Code for Sustainable Homes - reducing carbon emissions by 25per cent and saving 21 litres of water per person per day - is a considerable achievement, and will support the entire housing sector as it embraces the need to move towards zero carbon building in the future.
‘This report from Cyril Sweett is the just the first in a range of support measures to help the sector embrace this challenge as cost-effectively as possible, raising standards and saving fuel bills for the people who live in our homes, as well as directly contributing to measures tackling climate change across the economy.’
The report, which looked at four approaches to achieving Level 3 applied across six different house types, found that the Code would be most expensive to achieve in traditionally built detached and terraced houses. Apartments and two house types using modern methods of construction were the cheapest.
Further analysis of results showed that costs are likely to be lowest where it is possible to use wind energy or site-wide combined heat and power (CHP) technologies. It concludes that a planning requirement to use renewable energy would have a major impact on the strategy for meeting the Code’s energy standards.
Adam MacTavish, a Director of Management Consultancy at Cyril Sweett commented: ‘Whilst the costs of achieving these standards using traditional methods are high there are good reasons to expect actual costs to reduce as both the industry and its supply chain begin to focus on environmental performance.
‘These standards amplify the benefit of taking innovative approaches to both design and delivery. The extent to which housebuilders embrace this will begin to have a material impact upon their success.’
Related stories
- Bristol city bids to become UK's green capital
- Government's Sustainable Development Unit (SDU) sets out strategy
- Half the homes built in England by March 2011 to be funded by HCA: funds slashed from next year onwards
- Plans for moves towards low carbon living outlined by Government
- Local delivery placed centre stage by HCA
- Mixed reaction to draft Planning Policy Statement (PPS) on economic development
- Developers and RTPI voice concerns over the current form of Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL)
- Regional planners 'advised' to consider increasing housing provision across England by up to 500,000 homes
- Government vote rules out climate change amendment to its Planning Bill: a 'vital chance' to create greener future missed
- RTPI criticises 'outdated thinking on car-based retail development' and fears growth of OFT quasi planning agency
- Independent research into the economic and environmental impacts of tall buildings to go ahead
- Infrastructure, housing and transport economics 'must be' assessed by councils and RDAs, suggests Government report
- New self diagnostic tool designed to help planners around the world assess skills and capacity
- Three million homes by 2020 target under threat unless councils and private sector investors step in, says report
- Clear standards and ‘output focused’ targets called for in order to meet green development targets
- SWRDA outlines plans to make economic development projects ‘zero carbon’ by 2013
- Borough Council secures 30 million in infrastructure contributions from developers prior to CIL introduction
- Eco towns shortlist: finding sites for development to take place
- Councils to provide on-site renewable energy and local community energy schemes, says PPS4: 'notable gaps', say FoE
- Number of proposed eco towns is doubled: TCPA warns against 40 degree cities


