Why place matters: public economics and their application in a spatial context: paper published by CLG
Why place matters is the second in a series of papers highlighting key pieces of economic and analytical work undertaken by the Department of Communities and Local Government. It is intended as an introduction to the principles of public economics, and how these apply in a spatial context.
The paper identifies the economic reasons why place matters, uses this as a rationale for spatial policies and highlights the policy implications, including theimportance of intervening at the right spatial level. The paper goes on to explore the underlying principles for the allocation of responsibility for economic policies across different government levels and then applies these principles to six economic policy areasin the context of the Review of Sub-National Economic Development and Regeneration.
The paper is also concerned with the economics of why place matters. It does not consider wider social, environmental and political reasons of why place matters, eg political structures or cultural identity. It is aimed at those in the public sector and beyond, with an interest in Communities and Local Government’s policy responsibilities, including those who need to understand the spatial implications of policy.
This second paper is published alongside the Prosperous Places: Taking Forward the Review of Sub-National Economic Development and Regeneration (Communities and Local Government 2008). It highlights some of the underpinning Communities and Local Government analysis which fed into–and supported a number of recommendations of–the Review of Sub-National Economic Development and Regeneration; including empowering local authorities to promote economic development and neighbourhood renewal, while recognising the benefits of supporting local authorities to work together at the sub-regional level.
The first paperin the series (Communities and Local Government, 2007) provided a conceptual framework for analysing the rationale for Communities and Local Government’s policy interventions, based on the three main rationales for government intervention known as the 'three Es': efficiency; equity; and the environment.
Related stories
- Build Now, Pay Later in Basingstoke: new model for delivering new housing more quickly on publicly owned land?
- Local Government Finance Bill paves way for TIF and new funding mechanisms
- LEPs should have 'key role' in the Growing Places fund and housing development, says the HCA
- New deals for cities: LEPs may get planning powers, and be involved in local housing
- Revolt over NPPF presumption in favour of sustainable development: brownfield tax relief will not be scrapped
- Tough times ahead for planning, development and environmental services, says report
- Greener urban spaces with more trees worth up to £360 per year to residents
- £50 billion plan for growth targets housing: local authorities explore new funding models to drive development
- Make it 'tougher' for out-of-town-retail and easier for town centres, says Portas in report on forthcoming high street review
- Community 'front-runners' may receive funding for neighbourhood planning initiatives directly
- Community Infrastructure Levy Regulations, recently published by government, outline steps for 'effective' collections
- Long-awaited strategy to bring empty homes back into use comes a step closer
- Plans for decentralisation and empowerment of core cities' key functions, including planning, will drive growth
- Public space and street activities in UK to be 'deregulated' as part of the Red Tape Challenege
- Newark and Sherwood District Council CIL charges approved: plans are to raise '£35m over the next 15 years'
- RDA assets transferred to HCA for development, investment in and disposal
- New enterprise zones announced: but mistake to resurrect old terminology and EZ 'neglect the role of the developer'
- Can enterprise zones deliver growth and development this time around, using new economic and planning tools?
- Nationwide myth-busting campaign needed to ensure better informed debate about the role of planning
- Change of use proposals could 'remove the responsibility of developers to ensure the needs of local residents are met'



