Independent research into the economic and environmental impacts of tall buildings to go ahead
Liz Peace, chief executive of the BPF, has announced plans for independent research into the economic and environmental impacts of tall buildings.
Tall buildings have been very much in the news recently. Plans for schemes such as The Shard have attracted a lot of publicity while arguments over the extent to which such buildings should be allowed are being aired in the context of the London Mayoral election.
The issues involved are sometimes characterised simplistically as a battle between conservationists obsessed with protecting views of St Paul’s from Primrose Hill and hard-nosed developers intent on wreaking havoc on London’s skyline in pursuit of maximum profit. What is needed is a more balanced debate so that proper account is taken, both of the aesthetic impact of tall buildings and of the extent to which they can bring economic or sustainability benefits.
Liz Peace said: 'Unfortunately, little work has been done on these latter aspects and it was to fill this gap that the BPF recently commissioned some independent research from the consultants, Colin Buchanan. Any debate in this area does, of course, have to differentiate between the case for higher levels of density and the need for tall buildings. High density can be achieved in various ways - by groundscrapers as well as skyscrapers.
'There is a need, therefore to look first at the potential benefits of high density development – which might include greater working efficiency and the ability to focus employment in sustainable locations around transport nodes - before going on to consider whether there are certain situations where such benefits can only be delivered by building tall.
'It is crucial that arguments about these issues should become more evidence based and I hope that out report – which should be available before the summer - will contribute to that process.'
For more information on our views contact the BPF on 07968 124545 or ateacher@bpf.org.uk
Tall buildings have been very much in the news recently. Plans for schemes such as The Shard have attracted a lot of publicity while arguments over the extent to which such buildings should be allowed are being aired in the context of the London Mayoral election.
The issues involved are sometimes characterised simplistically as a battle between conservationists obsessed with protecting views of St Paul’s from Primrose Hill and hard-nosed developers intent on wreaking havoc on London’s skyline in pursuit of maximum profit. What is needed is a more balanced debate so that proper account is taken, both of the aesthetic impact of tall buildings and of the extent to which they can bring economic or sustainability benefits.
Liz Peace said: 'Unfortunately, little work has been done on these latter aspects and it was to fill this gap that the BPF recently commissioned some independent research from the consultants, Colin Buchanan. Any debate in this area does, of course, have to differentiate between the case for higher levels of density and the need for tall buildings. High density can be achieved in various ways - by groundscrapers as well as skyscrapers.
'There is a need, therefore to look first at the potential benefits of high density development – which might include greater working efficiency and the ability to focus employment in sustainable locations around transport nodes - before going on to consider whether there are certain situations where such benefits can only be delivered by building tall.
'It is crucial that arguments about these issues should become more evidence based and I hope that out report – which should be available before the summer - will contribute to that process.'
For more information on our views contact the BPF on 07968 124545 or ateacher@bpf.org.uk
Related stories
- Research study highlights 'positive economic impact' of tall buildings
- London workers have much lower carbon footprints than others in the UK, says report
- Clear standards and ‘output focused’ targets called for in order to meet green development targets
- Attaining Level 3 of the new Code for Sustainable Homes will cost 3 per cent more than EcoHomes standard
- Technical guidance to improve the energy efficiency of new homes published
- Bristol city bids to become UK's green capital
- Call for ‘radical rethink’ of land use to take account of climate change impacts
- Government's Sustainable Development Unit (SDU) sets out strategy
- Government considers 'eco-town' developments
- Industry group calls for cheap land for eco homes
- Europan 9: seminars, site visits and competition now underway
- Zero carbon development for Brighton goes ahead
- Home builders respond to sustainability agenda, says report, but much more needs to be done...
- New award for carbon capture technology for University of Greenwich team
- Revise housing targets to spare greenfield land and re-focus on carbon impact of new housing, says report
- New European programme established to integrate climate change adaptation into regional planning
- Zero waste test sites named across England
- Green roof toolkit launched for London
- Britain's cities enjoy resurgence in competitiveness, says new report
- Cutting out eco technologies to save costs could jeapordise 2016 zero carbon housing target, says survey
