Focus on 'eco-quarters' that encompass urban expansion projects and redevelopment – not eco towns, says RTPI
Ecotown environmental standards should be applied to all new housing according to the Royal Town Planning Institute (RTPI), which is calling on the Government to adopt an 'eco-quarters' policy which encompasses urban expansion projects and redevelopment.
The call coincides with a march on Parliament today to protest against ecotowns and present a petition against them. The RTPI, which believes the Government is right to promote environmentally sustainable housing, believes the ecotown concept should be expanded to encompass all types of housing development so that only the most environmentally friendly and locally appropriate housing is allowed to proceed. It believes the only way to guarantee that is to ensure all housing is brought through a local, plan-led development framework, with every application judged against the same criteria.
The RTPI is calling on the Government to raise the minimum environmental standards that ecotowns must achieve in order to gain approval and broaden the concept to include regeneration and urban expansion projects. These types of development will ultimately be called upon to deliver the bulk of the 3 million new homes the Government says need to be built by 2020 and, as well as being easier to link to existing infrastructure and public transport networks, will offer residents greater opportunity to adopt live-work lifestyles.
RTPI Secretary General Robert Upton said: 'The environmental aims of ecotowns are laudable and the Government is right to pursue a policy of environmentally sustainable housing. But we’d like to see all new housing development aspire to the same high environmental standards.
'Shifting focus from an ecotown to an eco-quarters policy, which encompasses urban expansion projects and redevelopment, would be a positive step in delivering sustainable lifestyles. Using and reusing existing infrastructure and services reduces the carbon load compared with new build. Locating development as part of existing towns reduces the need to travel. Intelligent urban design, with significant amounts of live-work developments, will contribute meaningfully to the eco-standards that the Government rightly seeks.'
Related stories
- Densities of between 50 and 100 homes per hectare required for eco towns, says new advice
- Peterborough zero carbon community developer selected
- Tougher green standards should be the aim for all new housing development, not just eco towns, says RTPI
- High green standards needed to qualify for eco towns status, says minister
- Eco towns approach open to serious legal challenges, say top planning lawyers
- Further doubts cast on eco towns proposals – some by Government departments
- Arup to develop plans for eco village on 72-acre Carlisle site
- Eco towns strongly criticised for inadequate public transport links and other shortcomings by government panel
- Government 'clarifies' policy on eco towns, including future role of the HCA
- Carbon Challenge zero carbon Barratt home goes on display
- Eco towns getting a rough ride from public, local authorities – and some politicians
- Opposition grows to eco towns proposals: Stratford-on-Avon District Council says no to Long Marsh
- Sherford, Devon, becomes first planning application to get approval under the new Local Development Framework system
- Eco towns' homes will count towards housing targets
- Northstowe: eco town precursor council chiefs are 'disappointed with proposals put forward by developers'
- Eco towns could 'seriously increase pressure' on overstretched infrastructure in the south east, says SEERA
- Climate change-related sustainable communities training must underpin activities; not be a 'bolt-on', says report
- Eco towns could become isolated and 'soulless Stepford Wives suburbia', warns RTPI
- 15 potential locations for eco towns announced
- Planning application submitted for 195 Code Level 6 homes on Hanham Hall Carbon Challenge site

