Eight out of ten people agree that better quality buildings and public spaces improve their quality of life
Nearly nine out of ten people (87%) agree that better quality buildings and public spaces improve their quality of life, according to new research published by CABE, the government’s design advisors, on its tenth anniversary.
In polling conducted by Ipsos MORI, more than eight out of ten people (82%) say they are interested in the look and feel of buildings and public spaces. Only three per cent of the population doesn’t believe the quality of buildings and public space has an impact on their health and wellbeing. The results reveal how much the public cares about the quality of the built environment.
Men and women appear to agree equally (both 87%) that better quality buildings and public space improves their quality of life. And ethnic background seems to make little difference to people’s interest in buildings and places (83% and 81% of white and BME people, respectively, say they are interested). But older people tend to be more interested in how the built environment looks and feels to use than younger people; while those approaching retirement age are more than a fifth more engaged (22%) than people aged 16-24.
There are key regional differences. Over a quarter (26%) of East Midlands residents are not interested in how buildings or public spaces look or feel. By comparison, nearly nine out of ten (87%) people in the North West region said they were interested.
The quality of the built environment is seen as important by voters across the political spectrum. Only two per cent of people who intend to vote Conservative don’t have any interest in what buildings, streets, parks and public spaces look or feel like to use. This compares with four per cent of people who said they would vote Labour and three per cent who said they would vote for other parties.
Richard Simmons, CABE chief executive said: ‘It’s vital that people making critical decisions about public spending appreciate exactly what the public wants and values. The quality of buildings and places are clearly not a party political issue: they simply affect everyone, every day.’
Related stories
- Government Red Tape Challenge spotlights housing and construction: excessive regulation to be sent to the scrapheap
- Shapps: New toolkit for regeneration highlights range of powers and tools devolved to Town Halls, businesses and residents'
- Neighbourhood planning 'should contribute to sustainable development' says Localism Bill as it clears Lords review
- Localism Bill: Provisions enabling small local groups to call referendums have been dropped
- Bishop Review: should developers pay for design review, and why communities are the new clients
- The Brixton Pound launches UK's first local e-currency on second anniversary
- Leaflet explains five key stages to neighbourhood planning, from definition to legality
- The Green Infrastructure Partnership will support creation of rooftop gardens, community gardens and living walls
- More front runner neighbourhoods selected to 'test out neighbourhood planning'
- Publication of public sector asset information to be used alongside new community rights to improve resource management
- NYC makes support for urban farming and rooftop greenhouses official: city to maintain a database of unused land for urban farms
- 'Comprehensive' suite of free resources for community enterprises launched
- Peers call on ministers to remove top-down micromanagement from the Localism Bill and also debate local finance
- Action plan calls for more support for self builders and self build communities
- Big Society vanguards are helping local communities to take control of local placemaking
- Meanwhile use of spaces given boost by removal of planning permissions to temporarily change use
- Input needed for new standard, BS 8904, on the sustainable development of communities
- Community groups campaigning to save local assets can apply for Compulsory Purchase Orders
- Benefits of green space will become part of neighbourhood planning policy
- Councils say 1,000 community asset transfers are underway in many urban and deprived areas: rationale is to 'save money'
