Who should build our homes? New report makes the arguments and asks for feedback
As the housing market begins to stabilise after a traumatic period of decline, a new report called Who should build our homes? challenges any presumption that housebuilding should just continue from where it left off.
Earlier this year, Richard Simmons, CABE chief executive argued in No more toxic assets that more of the same is simply not good enough.
CABE is launching a debate about who should build our homes. Six housing experts have contributed their own strong views through a collection of essays. They put the case for new models – for much less reliance on build-to-sell; and for renting to become the norm once again. They also argue for self-build and community commissioned housing to enter the mainstream instead of being marginalised at the periphery.
Christine Whitehead, professor of housing economics at the London School of Economics (LSE), points out that housing supply never came near to meeting demand. She argues for a planning framework which incentivises the right sort of development at the local level.
Peter Studdert, planning director for Cambridge’s growth areas, calls for local authorities to be set free from central government restraints so they can play a more active role in funding and delivering new homes.
Liz Peace, chief executive of the British Property Federation, wants to see a move away from the build-to-sell model and a positive attitude to renting from investors and consumers.
Stephen Hill, director of C20 futureplanners, champions the self-build movement and its potential to create high quality places.
Pooran Desai, co-founder of the BioRegional Development Group, argues that climate change should be tackled at the neighbourhood scale.
Dickon Robinson argues for a more diverse tenure mix, and that developers need to be incentivised to build larger homes.
This is the start of a debate on who should build our homes, so tell us what you think about the ideas in the six essays. CABE will continue the debate with an expert workshop in January.
Related stories
- Build Now, Pay Later in Basingstoke: new model for delivering new housing more quickly on publicly owned land?
- LEPs should have 'key role' in the Growing Places fund and housing development, says the HCA
- Greener urban spaces with more trees worth up to £360 per year to residents
- £50 billion plan for growth targets housing: local authorities explore new funding models to drive development
- Long-awaited strategy to bring empty homes back into use comes a step closer
- Cost of building to Code for Sustainable Homes level 3 falls: report reveals issues with delivering levels 4, 5 and 6
- Action plan calls for more support for self builders and self build communities
- Report indicates that geography and type of new affordable housing has changed in response to mixed communities agenda
- Empty long-term office space could deliver 250,000 new homes if converted: consultation on change of use goes ahead
- Death knell of localism: Flint denounces measures announced by Government for planning and growth
- Plans to build 150,000 affordable homes by 2015 may not be achievable due to scrapping of RSS, say MPs
- Planning rules should allow vacant commercial units to become housing without need for planning permission, says report
- Extra monies pledged for building new homes, bringing long term empty properties back into use and improving social housing
- DCLG will 'alter significantly under the government’s localism agenda': more enabling and less intervening, says Sir Bob
- Homes on the Farm: Councils should amend planning policies to enable disused farm buildings to de developed
- Ministers remove 'red tape' and 'alphabet soup' of standards that deter development, and offer community incentives
- NIMBYism not so prevalent as supposed, suggests report
- Community Right to Build: housing trusts could bypass the planning system to progress development
- Homes & Communities Agency loses an extra £470 million: HCA 'will not be handling training or policy'
- Mix of housing standards required by building regulations, planning policy and funders 'desperately needs rationalisation'



