Development control times vary within local authorities, says report: variability appears to be 'feature of the development'
New evidence has been revealed about the how long it takes to get planning consent for major housing sites in England and the factors which tend to be linked to longer or shorter approval times. The study is the largest of its kind.
The findings are published in Housing supply and planning controls the impact of planning control processing times on housing supply in England. The study of sites approved for major residential housing was commissioned by the National Housing and Planning Advice Unit (NHPAU), the country's foremost advisory body on housing affordability and the planning delivery system for housing. It is the latest report from the NHPAU designed to aid understanding of how England's planning and delivery system for housing works.
Reading University collected data on over 900 sites, approved for major residential housing in 2005-2006, in 45 English local authorities. The research focused on sites, rather than planning applications, as it is sites which generate housing and will be managed through to development. It covered only sites where applications were granted rather than ultimately refused.
The report highlights an average determination period for the sites analysed of 43 weeks. The study finds that differences in development control times take place within each local authority and that variability appears to be a feature of the development control system overall.
The research also identifies that:
- Development control time increases with the size of development (measured by number of homes) but overall takes less time per dwelling built. Time is not affected by other scheme features.
- Trophy or prestige projects, as well as social housing schemes, tend to go through development control faster than others.
- The development control process takes longer in more affluent localities and where there are hung councils.
The report concludes that uncertainty in time taken to process applications has significant implications for housing supply. It argues that long determination periods "will inevitably discourage investment in bringing forward new sites in the period following a recession, as developers will want to be certain that a strong recovery is under way before they make any such lengthy commitment."
Neil McDonald, Chief Executive of the NHPAU, said: 'There is a lot of anecdote and assertion about how long planning approval takes and why some sites take longer than others. This study provides hard evidence to enable us to have a much better understanding of the variability in approval times. It deserves careful consideration by all involved in planning for housing.
'A key aim for the NHPAU is to help local and regional authorities make the planning delivery system for housing work. We do not pretend to have all the answers but by providing new, robust evidence of the factors in play we can help ensure that the system is better able to respond to demand and deliver sufficient housing of the right type and in the right location, when we need it.
'Communities and Local Government has recently responded to the Killian Pretty Review of the planning system and the National Audit Office study of planning applications. Last month it began a consultation on the establishment of a new planning policy statement on development management. Our study is relevant to this process and we will be discussing its findings with key players at local, regional, and national level.'
Housing supply and planning controls - the impact of planning control processing times on housing supply in England, is available at www.communities.gov.uk/nhpau/keypublications/research/.
Related stories
- 'Green planning rulebook' launched to ensure that new developments are planned and built sustainably
- New evidence base for land use strategy suggests that 'vital' appraisal is needed to meet future challenges
- Research develops model to estimate how how mix, density and location of housing affects affordability and value
- New policy framework for preparation of regional strategies published
- Urban design studies for rural communities to be supported and 'fast tracked' through public funding
- Draft national policy statement on energy 'fails in every respect', says RTPI
- Transport planners using models that are 'not fit for purpose', says report
- 'Joined up delivery' of energy, water and waste infrastructure at community scale calls for 'radical new ways of partnering'
- Design and access statements: more guidance needed to combat 'dramatic variations' between local authorities?
- Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) comes closer: new plans outlined
- Bill to protect gardens and urban green spaces has first reading
- Public transport is key to helping struggling cities to move forward, says report
- New public service initiatives 'to boost local accountability and economic viability'
- Ministers consider temporary allotments scheme and 'meanwhile' leases
- PPS 4 sets out policy framework for planning for sustainable economic development: a boost for small shops and town centres?
- New guide explains benefits of planning performance agreements (PPAs)
- Who should build our homes? New report makes the arguments and asks for feedback
- Consultation on measures to streamline the planning system announced
- OS mapping data to be made more accessible to the public
- Consultation launched on new planning proposals for small-scale renewable and low-carbon technologies


